Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108487›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026

The impact of nutrition education on food insecurity, food literacy, and dietary intake: a single-arm pre-post intervention study.

Mahitab Hanbazaza, Lama Alaklabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahitab HanbazazaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Sciences and Design, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 22258, Saudi Arabia. mhanbazaza@kau.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-1668
Lama AlaklabiDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Sciences and Design, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 22258, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah J:151-253-1440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor food literacy behaviours may exacerbate food insecurity. Therefore, food literacy interventions have been increasingly utilized to improve food security and enhance dietary intake among low-socioeconomic adults. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a nutrition education intervention on food security, food literacy, and dietary intake among low-income Saudi families.

methodsThis single-arm pre-post intervention study was conducted between June and August 2024. Seventy-three adults completed the pre-survey and 67 completed the post-survey. The survey included questions on food security, food literacy, and dietary intake.

resultsThe intervention was significantly associated with improvements in both food insecurity and food literacy. The mean food insecurity score decreased from 4.06 ± 2.98 pre-intervention to 2.71 ± 2.58 post-intervention, with a mean reduction of - 1.35 ± 1.62 (P < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.83). In terms of food literacy, the mean score increased from 46.4 ± 10.9 to 58.4 ± 7.1, with a mean increase of 12 ± 9.07 (P < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.32). Dietary intake also improved following the intervention. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, significant improvements remained for fruit intake, red and white meat intake, legumes, and bread and cereals.

conclusionsThe intervention showed short-term improvement in food insecurity and food literacy, along with favorable changes in dietary intake among low-income Saudi families.

Indexed as

DietFood InsecurityHealth EducationHealth LiteracyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovertySaudi ArabiaYoung AdultAdultDietary intakeFood insecurityFood literacySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID42108487
PMCPMC13179636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.