ArticleBMC medical education2026
Prenatal clinicians' perspectives on trauma-informed care competency and training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrenatal clinicians express willingness to provide trauma-informed care (TIC) yet report barriers in translating TIC principles into practice. This study explored prenatal clinicians' perspectives on TIC competency and training, with the goal of identifying actionable strategies to strengthen training approaches in prenatal care.
methodsA mixed methods study design was employed. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit prenatal clinicians with varied professional roles, years of practice, and TIC training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 prenatal clinicians that were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsThe majority of the sample comprised female clinicians (95.7%) with an average of 11.8 ± 9.4 years in practice. Most participants were certified nurse-midwives (52.2%). While 60.9% of participants reported prior TIC training, one-third (34.8%) reported attending a TIC-specific seminar or conference in the past two years. Quantitative results identified a gap in translating TIC knowledge into practice despite favorable attitudes towards TIC. We identified two thematic domains: (1) TIC competency, and (2) training and education. Under TIC competency, sub-themes included prenatal clinician support of TIC and lack of competence. Training and education sub-themes included inadequate TIC training, impact evaluation, TIC practice gap and inconsistent quality of care, barriers to training, and existing resources and opportunities.
conclusionsFindings highlight the importance of TIC yet current training is inadequate, fragmented, and insufficiently tailored to the prenatal context. Future research should examine TIC training models in prenatal care, assessing the long-term impact on clinicians and patients and how organizational and cultural contexts influence sustainable, system-wide adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.