Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108429›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026

AI In the Chair: ChatGPT In Dental Education-A Cross-Sectional Study of Student Use and Perceptions in New Zealand.

Li Mei, Francesca Treuren, Jordy Ryan-Kidd, Adam Richardson, Alyssa Shelton, Guangzhao Guan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li MeiDepartment of Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-8091
Francesca TreurenDepartment of Oral Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jordy Ryan-KiddDepartment of Oral Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Adam RichardsonDepartment of Oral Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Alyssa SheltonDepartment of Oral Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Guangzhao GuanDepartment of Oral Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-9865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the usage, implications, and perceptions of ChatGPT among dental students and understand how students incorporate ChatGPT into their academic routines, as well as the perceived benefits and concerns.

methodsAn electronic survey was distributed to all students enrolled in the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) in New Zealand's National Centre for Dentistry. The survey was directly sent to the students' email addresses to ensure comprehensive coverage. The self-administered questionnaire, hosted on Qualtrics, included a series of questions designed to capture demographic information, explore students' backgrounds, and understand their perceptions of ChatGPT.

resultsA total of 148 responses (42% response rate) were recorded. The majority of respondents (85%) reported using ChatGPT, primarily discovering the tool through social media, friends, and word of mouth. The study assessed ChatGPT usage and perceptions among dental students. Significant differences were found in usage frequency (p = 0.04) and curriculum integration opinions (p = 0.02), with upper-year students (BDS4 and BDS5) differing from BDS2. Usage correlated with perceived study improvement (r = 0.34), trust (r = 0.20), and peer recommendations (r = 0.31). Seniority was weakly linked to lower usage (r = -0.27) and less integration support (r = -0.26). Concerns about misinformation were consistent across years (p = 0.10), but seniors detected more inaccuracies (p = 0.04).

conclusionsChatGPT is widely used among dental students, primarily for simplifying concepts and summarising information. While ChatGPT could support learning, its limitations necessitate careful guidance to ensure it complements rather than replaces critical thinking and evidence-based education.

Indexed as

Education, DentalGenerative Artificial IntelligenceStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAIartificial intelligenceChatGPTdental educationdentistry

Identifiers

PMID42108429
PMCPMC13686672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.