Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108414›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science2026

Sensory and Physicochemical Evaluation of Dairy-Like Plant-Based Milk Formulations Predicted by Machine Learning.

Anesu A Magwere, Russell Keast, Joanna M Gambetta, Nelum Pematilleke, Sonja Kukuljan, Amy Logan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anesu A MagwereDeakin Centre for Advanced Food Sciences, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-6866
Russell KeastDeakin Centre for Advanced Food Sciences, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-7687
Joanna M GambettaSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Nelum PematillekeCSIRO, Food Innovation Centre, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Sonja KukuljanNoumi Limited, Ingleburn, NSW, Australia.
Amy LoganCSIRO, Food Innovation Centre, Werribee, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9062-7266

Funding

CSIRODeakin UniversityNoumi Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) are now increasingly used by some consumers in similar ways to cow milk. However, they differ in their physicochemical and sensory properties. Improving PBMAs to better mimic dairy is limited by the time and cost of development trials. Machine learning offers a promising approach to predict optimal formulations without the need for extensive trial and error. In this study, Random Forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) models were used to formulate PBMAs (Formulation 1 and 2, respectively) that mimic cow milk. Sensory analysis, viscosity, stability, color, particle size, and headspace volatiles were compared to cow milk to assess model accuracy. Both formulations were sensorially distinct from coconut, oat, soy, almond, pasteurized, and ultra-high temperature (UHT) cow milk, associated with vanilla, caramel, astringent, bitter, metallic, and nutty notes, compared to the sweet, dairy, and coconut notes of dairy. The formulations contained aldehydes, including hexanal and pentanal from soy, although compounds including vanillin, octanal, and 1-pentanol were shared with cow milk. UHT cow (0.68 µm) had the smallest average particle size (D

Indexed as

Machine LearningMilkPlant-based MilkAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCattleColorHumansParticle SizePredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestTasteViscosityVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID42108414
PMCPMC13158331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.