ArticleCancer medicine2026
Outcomes Among MM Patients Receiving Early Intervention for MRD Progression Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is essential for evaluating treatment response among multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Many patients experience MRD progression (MRD-P) before they meet the criteria for clinical or biochemical progression (PD), thus raising questions about the timing of treatment. In this retrospective study, the effect of early intervention (EI) on prognosis was investigated among 42 newly diagnosed MM patients who developed MRD-P after initial treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation. In the EI group (n = 9), treatment was modified at the onset of MRD-P; in the PD group (n = 33), treatment was delayed until disease progression occurred. At a median follow-up of 25 months, compared with the PD group, the EI group demonstrated a longer time to progression (median 34.8 months vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.029), superior overall survival (median not reached vs. 41.0 months, p = 0.034), and significantly higher MRD re-negativity rates (median 12.6 months vs. 75.9 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that early intervention was significantly associated with improved MRD re-negativity (HR = 0.07; p = 0.001). This hypothesis-generating retrospective study demonstrated that early intervention at MRD-P onset was associated with improved survival outcomes and higher rates of MRD re-negativity in this cohort. Despite significant limitations, such as the small sample size, nonrandomized design, and unmeasured confounders, these findings provide preliminary data to inform the design of future prospective randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.