Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108353›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Overview of Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology for T-Cell Engaging Bispecific Antibodies.

Rong Deng, Chi-Chung Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rong DengGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Chi-Chung LiGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA. li.chichung@gene.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs) are an exciting advancement in cancer immunotherapy, enabling potent and durable tumor responses by bridging CD3-positive T cells with tumor-specific antigens. By forming artificial immune synapses, TCBs activate T cells in an MHC-independent manner, initiating robust anti-tumor responses. However, these unique mechanisms present challenges, including complex pharmacokinetics (PK), target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD), and on-target toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and off-tumor effects. This chapter offers a comprehensive review of the clinical pharmacology considerations involved in TCB development, covering their mechanisms of action, PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics, and bioanalytical strategies. It also summarizes approaches to mitigate risks and optimize therapeutic outcomes.Advanced modeling techniques, such as quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) and physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling, are highlighted as valuable tools for addressing translational challenges. When combined with emerging applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning, these methods can provide further predictability and insights for optimizing dosing regimens, mitigating toxicities, and predicting clinical outcomes. The chapter also discusses strategies for overcoming resistance mechanisms through combination therapies and improving TCB constructs to enhance patient benefit. By integrating these insights, the chapter emphasizes the role of pharmacology and modeling advances in maximizing the therapeutic potential of TCBs for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsPharmacology, ClinicalT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansImmunotherapyAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBispecific antibodiesCytokine release syndrome (CRS)Dose optimizationModel-informed drug development (MIDD)Modeling and simulationsPK/PDQuantitative clinical pharmacologyStep-up dosingT-cell engagers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.