ArticleMedical physics2026
Integrating measurement and simulation for evaluation of patient-specific whole-body dosimetry in clinical BNCT.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a treatment modality that utilises high intensity neutron beam in combination with a boron drug to target cancer cells at the cellular level. Despite decades of research in this field, there are very few reports on out-of-field patient dose of BNCT. PURPOSE: To quantify patient whole-body out-of-field dose during clinical BNCT for recurrent head-and-neck cancer using an integrated measurement-simulation workflow.
methodsThe data of 271 patients that received BNCT for recurrent head and neck were analyzed for this study.First, the neutron and gamma ray doses were measured using activation foils and thermoluminescent dosimeters, respectively. The detectors were placed onto the surface of the patient at various locations and the reaction rate of the metal foils were measured. Second, PHITS Monte Carlo simulation was performed to evaluate the neutron energy spectrum at each location and the corresponding neutron equivalent dose was determined. The total dose was calculated by summing the neutron equivalent dose and the gamma ray dose. The results were compared with other radiotherapy modalities.
resultsThe mean ± standard deviation of equivalent dose at neck, chest, abdomen, waist, knee, and ankle were calculated to be 1.93 ± 1.12, 0.71 ± 0.42, 0.23 ± 0.12, 0.11 ± 0.06, 0.05 ± 0.03, 0.02 ± 0.01 Gy-eq, respectively. Excluding the neck region, the gamma ray dose was dominant at all measurement points. From the abdomen below, dose from the primary gamma ray were dominant, indicating a potential for reducing the dose to these regions by installing additional lead shielding in the treatment room walls. In comparison to other radiotherapy modalities, out-of-field dose of BNCT was found to be similar.
conclusionThe whole-body dose for patients that received BNCT for recurrent head and neck cancer were estimated by scaling PHITS derived neutron dose using multifoil reaction rates and adding measured gamma dose. The results showed the out-of-field dose was comparable to other radiotherapy modalities and further added confidence that BNCT is a safe treatment modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.