Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108203›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2026

Spraying Cry1A.105 + Cry2Ab2 Bt sweet corn has marginal benefit for Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) suppression.

Anders S Huseth, Kelly A Hamby, Shea Ill, Arthur Young, Brian A Nault, John W Mahas, Thomas Kuhar, Brian Currin, David Owens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anders S HusethDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-8555
Kelly A HambyDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8425-2018
Shea IllDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-8522-8511
Arthur YoungDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6540-7959
Brian A NaultDepartment of Entomology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-4277
John W MahasDepartment of Entomology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-3593
Thomas KuharDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-1494
Brian CurrinDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7280-0513
David OwensUniversity of Delaware Cooperative Extension, Carvel REC, Georgetown, DE, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Food and AgricultureSpecialty Crop Research Initiative 2023-51181-4115Specialty Crop Research Initiative no. 2023-51181-4115USDAU.S. Department of AgricultureU.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in fresh-market sweet corn requires multiple, precisely timed applications of effective insecticides. An alternative method to manage H. zea is sweet corn hybrids that express Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins, but this approach has become limited because H. zea populations have developed resistance to multiple Bt toxins. We hypothesized that spraying a marginally performing Bt hybrid with an effective insecticide would provide a level of H. zea control that neither approach could achieve independently. To test this idea, we compared H. zea control using Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 Bt sweet corn treated with chlorantraniliprole following either a 7, 4, or 2-3 day silk-stage spray schedule with control following the same spray schedule and the non-Bt isoline. This study was conducted in high and low H. zea pressure environments in 2024 and 2025. Results showed that the combination of insecticidal sprays and the Bt hybrid provided minimal additional benefit relative to the sprays alone. We did find that weekly applications of chlorantraniliprole resulted in measurable reductions in H. zea damage, but the benefit of additional sprays dissipated with increasing frequency. This effect was most apparent where H. zea pressure was low and there was no statistical separation among spray interval treatments. Our results highlight the challenge of producing undamaged sweet corn, even when a Bt hybrid is treated intensively with an insecticide. Outcomes show that existing action thresholds may need revision to include additional variables that are sensitive to current input and damage costs.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsecticidesMothsortho-AminobenzoatesPest Control, BiologicalZea maysAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsLarvaPlants, Genetically ModifiedBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinschlorantranilipoleEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus ThuringiensisInsecticidesortho-AminobenzoatesBacillus thuringiensiscorn earwormCry1A.105+Cry2Ab2thresholdZea mays L. convar. saccharata

Identifiers

PMID42108203
PMCPMC13268527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.