Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42108108›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC2026

Practical Guide and Best Practices for Diffusion NMR Processing With GNAT.

Tadeu Luiz Gomes Cabral, Guilherme Dal Poggetto, Claudio F Tormena, Mathias Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tadeu Luiz Gomes CabralChemistry Institute, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-065X
Guilherme Dal PoggettoAnalytical Research & Development, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-9166
Claudio F TormenaChemistry Institute, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1508-0694
Mathias NilssonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3301-7899

Funding

CEMUIQ-UNICAMPEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/E057888/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/E05899X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R018790/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/X035476/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Z534201/1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/10246-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/05081-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/11152-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/07116-6LIRMN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion-NMR, including diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (DOSY), is a powerful technique for measuring self-diffusion and inferring molecular size, shape, aggregation, and intermolecular interactions in solution. Its noninvasive nature and ability to separate components in complex mixtures have made DOSY widely used across chemistry, biochemistry, and materials science. However, accurate and reproducible diffusion measurements depend not only on careful experimental design but also on robust, transparent, and consistent data processing. Despite the growing adoption of diffusion-NMR, widely adopted protocols, practical tutorials, and broadly accepted guidelines for DOSY data analysis remain limited, contributing to variability in reported diffusion coefficients and reduced comparability between studies. The General NMR Analysis Toolbox (GNAT) is a free, open-source platform for visualizing and analyzing diffusion-NMR data. In this article, we present a clear, step-by-step guide to processing diffusion-NMR data with GNAT, emphasizing best practices, quality control, and common pitfalls. The workflow covers data import, preprocessing (including baseline/phase considerations and signal selection), diffusion fitting and model choice, validation of results, and recommendations for reporting key parameters and uncertainty. Although written with new users in mind, this guide also serves as a reference for experienced practitioners seeking greater consistency and rigor in DOSY analysis. By promoting standardized, reproducible workflows and encouraging the use of open-source tools, this work aims to improve the transparency, quality, and comparability of diffusion-NMR studies.

Identifiers

PMID42108108
PMCPMC13327220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.