ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Individualized circulating tumor DNA monitoring in two dogs with malignant melanoma.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) consists of genomic DNA fragments shed by tumor cells into the bloodstream that contain the same mutations present in the primary tumor. In human medicine, ctDNA has been utilized as a liquid biopsy tool and a noninvasive biomarker for the early diagnosis, prognosis, and management of several tumors. This study explored the utility of ctDNA monitoring using digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) during follow-up in two dogs with oral malignant melanoma. Whole-exome sequencing was performed to identify patient-specific tumor mutations, and dPCR probes designed for these mutations were then used to measure ctDNA levels in plasma samples obtained during follow-up. In two patients, ctDNAs were detected at the time of diagnosis, and in one patient, complete remission was attained via radiation; the disappearance of ctDNA was observed, followed by a re-elevation, indicating lymph node metastasis. In another patient in whom radiation therapy was ineffective, persistent ctDNA was noted during follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify patient-specific somatic mutations and monitor ctDNA using dPCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.