Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42107983›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2026

Temporal Trends of Colorectal Cancer Burden in India: A Nationwide and State-Level Analysis.

Rupayan Kundu, Nivedita Sarkar, Rishabh Kundu, Arjun Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rupayan KunduResident, Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Nivedita SarkarDr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Rishabh KunduMaterial Data Science for Stockpile Stewardship Center of Excellence and Electro-Ceramics Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-3939
Arjun ChatterjeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third among cancers globally, posing a significant public health issue. This study aimed to analyze CRC incidence, mortality, and risk factors across India from 1990 to 2021 using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study.

methodsWe utilized GBD 2021 data, analyzing age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), age-standardized death rates (ASDR), and annual percentage changes (APC) for CRC across India's 31 states. Statistical modeling, including two sample t-tests, was done.

resultsIn 2021, India reported 69,409 CRC cases (ASIR: 5.69 per 100,000) and 54,018 deaths (ASDR: 4.60 per 100,000). Both ASIR and ASDR showed increases from 1990 to 2021, highest in adults aged 85+, although these trends were not statistically significant. Mizoram reported the highest incidence rate. Behavioral risks accounted for the largest proportion of CRC deaths (38.85% [95% UI: 24.71-50.32]), particularly diets low in milk (19.16% [95% UI: 5.28-30.72]). High BMI contributed to 4.17% of CRC deaths and showed the highest increase from 1990 to 2021 (+127.47%).

conclusionThe rising incidence and mortality of CRC in India highlight the need for targeted public health interventions emphasizing dietary changes, improved screening, and healthcare infrastructure.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHumansIncidenceIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42107983
PMCPMC13157990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.