ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2026
Cardiovascular and hepatic outcomes: prognostic differences across MASLD-MetALD-ALD continuum.
Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Complications of Chronic Liver Disease.Circulation · 2026Review
- Alcohol-aware risk stratification and subtype-specific care pathways across metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease, and alcohol-associated liver disease.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Steatotic liver disease spectrum: From MASLD to MetALD and beyond - Clinical outcomes and precision medicine frontiers.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A paradigm shift in fatty liver disease nomenclature has introduced steatotic liver disease (SLD) as an umbrella term, encompassing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease (MetALD), and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). These SLD subtypes exist along a dynamic continuum shaped by the synergistic interplay of metabolic dysfunction and alcohol exposure. Accumulating evidence indicates that SLD exhibits distinct outcome-based clusters reflecting heterogeneity in pathogenic drivers and clinical trajectories. Cardiometabolic clusters, most prominently observed in MASLD, are characterized by systemic metabolic dysfunction and confer increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In contrast, liver-specific clusters demonstrate progressive fibrosis and cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In large-scale cohorts, CVD accounts for 40-50% of deaths in MASLD, while liver-related mortality predominates in ALD (>60%). The relative dominance of cardiometabolic versus liver-specific clusters shifts progressively across the MASLD-MetALD-ALD spectrum. While CVD remains a major driver of mortality, particularly in MASLD, hepatic outcomes increase stepwise with advancing fibrosis and greater alcohol exposure. Advanced fibrosis is the predominant shared determinant amplifying both CVD and hepatic risks across subtypes. This review synthesizes cardiovascular and hepatic outcome patterns across the MASLD-MetALD-ALD spectrum, highlighting the prognostic reorientation across the continuum, in which hepatic outcomes rise stepwise with alcohol exposure while cardiovascular risk remains an important but less subtype-differentiated burden. These findings advocate outcome-oriented risk stratification integrating noninvasive fibrosis assessment, alcohol biomarkers (phosphatidylethanol), and cardiovascular risk calculators within the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic framework. Understanding SLD as a modifiable continuum enables individualized management to optimize multisystem outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.