ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2026
Uptake of family planning methods among adults presenting with genital ulcers at community posts and public outpatient health facilities in central Uganda.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenital ulcer disease (GUD), a common clinical presentation at health facilities in Uganda, is often caused by sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and increases the risk of HIV. Family planning (FP) methods are effective for preventing unintended pregnancies, while some methods, namely male and female condoms, also reduce the risk of STI transmission. However, little has been documented about FP use among individuals with GUD in Uganda.
methodsPatients with clinician-confirmed genital ulcers were enrolled for a GUD study at six sites across government clinics and community outreaches in Kampala, Wakiso, and Kalangala, Uganda, between July/2023 and June/2024. Demographic, behavioral, and family planning use data were collected in English and Luganda using prespecified questionnaires. Urine and genital swabs were collected for gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and blood for HIV and syphilis antibodies using rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). Pregnant women were excluded from the analysis. Associations with FP use were explored using rank sum tests, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate.
resultsOf 104 participants with confirmed genital ulceration, 75(72.1%) were women, 12(16.0%) of whom were pregnant. Overall, of 92 non-pregnant participants, 36(39.1%) had a reactive HIV RDT; 10(27.8%) were new diagnoses. Nine (9.8%) had positive tests for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis. No men reported condom use. Of the 63 non-pregnant female participants analyzed, 29(46.0%) reported current FP use. Subdermal implants were the most used method in 15/29(51.7%). Twenty-one (33.3%) reported ≥ 2 sexual partners in the past 3 months. FP use was significantly associated with younger age, being married, transactional sex, ≥ 2 sexual partners in the past 3 months, and being sexually active in the past month.
conclusionMore than one-sixth of women with GUD were pregnant. The uptake of FP among individuals with GUD was low, and HIV/STI prevalence was high. Effective FP has a key role in preventing unintended pregnancies and mother-to-child transmission of STIs. These findings highlight the need for educational and policy strategies to increase sensitization on sexual health, including increasing uptake of FP and encouraging male condom use in a population at high risk of STIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.