ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Intracranial compliance monitoring using pulse shape index in traumatic brain injury: relation to cerebral physiology and clinical outcome.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse waveform reflects intracranial compliance. The pulse shape index (PSI), an artificial intelligence (AI)-based metric ranging from 1 (normal) to 4 (disturbed), quantifies morphological waveform pathologies. Early findings in smaller cohorts indicate that elevated PSI is associated with mass lesions, aging, higher ICP, and worse outcome. This study examined how PSI relates to other markers of intracranial compliance, the risk of ICP crisis, and clinical outcome in a large traumatic brain injury (TBI) cohort.
methodsThis retrospective study included 321 TBI patients with ≥ 12 h of ICP/PSI monitoring. PSI was analysed in relation to ICP, ICP pulse amplitude (AmpICP), the moving correlation coefficient between mean ICP and ICP amplitude (RAP index), and arterial blood pressure (ABP) using generalised additive models (GAMs). Linear mixed-effects models assessed whether PSI during preceding hours predicted later ICP elevations (e.g., ICP > 20/22 mmHg). The prognostic value of PSI was tested using univariable Mann-Whitney U test and multivariable (after adjustment for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, ICP, CPP, and PRx) logistic regression for mortality (Glasgow Outcome Scale = 1) and favourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale = 4-5).
resultsPSI increased with higher ICP, AmpICP, RAP, and ABP. PSI during the preceding hour predicted increased ICP burden above 20 mmHg (marginal R
conclusionsPSI was linked to established indicators of intracranial compliance and provided early warning of impending intracranial hypertension. While PSI showed univariable associations with outcome, these did not remain in multivariable models. Retrospectively, PSI does not appear to have independent prognostic value, but rather a complementary value. Prospectively, it may serve as a dynamic marker of deteriorating intracranial compliance and an early signal for future ICP crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.