Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106843›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026

Eye-related emergency calls and prehospital management in region Zealand, Danmark: a register-based cohort study.

Natalie Jensen, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Torben Lykke Sørensen, Amalie Elisabeth Thiele-Nygaard, Thea Palsgaard Møller, Magnus Rafner, Astrid Merete Blomberg, Helle Collatz Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalie JensenPrehospital Centre Region Zealand,Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark.
Stig Nikolaj Fasmer BlombergPrehospital Centre Region Zealand,Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark.
Torben Lykke SørensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Amalie Elisabeth Thiele-NygaardPrehospital Centre Region Zealand,Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark.
Thea Palsgaard MøllerPrehospital Centre Region Zealand,Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark.
Magnus RafnerCAMES - Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Astrid Merete BlombergPrehospital Centre Region Zealand,Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark.
Helle Collatz ChristensenPrehospital Centre Region Zealand,Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark. hcli@regionsjaelland.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye-related symptoms ranging from mild irritation to acute vision loss can lead to emergency calls. While many cases are benign, others involve chemical exposures or trauma requiring urgent care to prevent permanent damage. Prehospital characteristics, dispatch categorization, and early management of eye-related emergencies remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic description of eye-related emergency calls, including patient characteristics, dispatch categorization, and prehospital management, within the framework of the Danish Index for Emergency Care.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all emergency calls [1-1-2] in Region Zealand, Denmark, from November 2017 to June 2025, describing eye symptoms. We linked data from the Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system, the Prehospital Patient Records (PPJ), and the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR). Patient demographics, paramedic assessment of primary problem, on-scene symptoms, prehospital treatments and hospital outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics.

resultsA total of 376 patients were identified calling 1-1-2 and registered with eye related symptoms as the main complaint. Of these, 36 (9.6%) were excluded due to missing patient identifiers or prehospital patient records, leaving 340 in the cohort. Median age was 49.5 years (IQR 29-68), and 62.1% were male. Most calls were categorized as priority B (urgent situation not assessed as acute life-threatening) (70.9%). The leading primary problems were chemical exposures (31.5%), vision loss (25.9%), and ocular trauma (18.2%). Vision disturbance (54.4%) was the most frequently prehospital reported symptom. Prehospital interventions were rarely documented, with irrigation being the most reported procedure (27.1%). Notably, 39 of 340 patients (11.5%) were suspected of stroke prehospitally, and among 283 admitted to hospital, 21 (7.4%) received a confirmed TIA or stroke diagnosis. The median length of stay was 3.7 h (IQR 2.0-7.7). Most frequent discharge diagnoses were injury of the eye and orbit (17.7%), burn and corrosion confined to eye and adnexa (9.9%), and foreign body on external eye (7.8%).

conclusionEye-related emergency calls were primarily caused by chemical exposures, vision loss, and trauma, with relatively short hospital stays. Several patients classified as eye-related problems were later diagnosed with stroke, highlighting the need for better dispatcher recognition of visual stroke symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEye DiseasesRegistriesAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesChemical exposuresDispatch categorizationEmergency medical servicesEye-related symptomsOcular traumaPrehospitalStroke misclassificationStroke recognition

Identifiers

PMID42106843
PMCPMC13330381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.