ReviewImmunity & ageing : I & A2026
High-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in older adults with or without cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized trials on 511,890 participants.
Review in Immunity & ageing : I & A, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults remain highly vulnerable to serious influenza-related complications despite routine vaccination. Whether high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (HD-QIV) offers greater protection than standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (SD-QIV) against clinically important outcomes remains an important question.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HD-QIV with SD-QIV in adults aged 65 years or older. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to February 2026. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed according to baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) status.
resultsFour RCTs comprising 511,890 participants were included. HD-QIV was associated with significantly lower odds of cardio-respiratory hospitalization (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.90-0.97]) and cardiovascular hospitalization (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.89-0.98]), with no significant reduction in respiratory hospitalization (OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.80-1.01]). Significant reductions were also observed for hospitalization due to influenza (OR 0.61, 95% CI [0.50-0.74]), laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization (OR 0.69, 95% CI [0.56-0.86]), and heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.80, 95% CI [0.69-0.94]). No significant differences were found for all-cause hospitalization (P = 0.12), all-cause mortality (P = 0.413), myocardial infarction (P = 0.753), or serious adverse events (P = 0.419). No significant subgroup differences were observed according to baseline CVD status.
conclusionsIn older adults, HD-QIV was associated with modest but significant reductions in cardio-respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalization, as well as influenza-related and heart failure hospitalizations, without an apparent safety penalty. These findings support preferential use of high-dose influenza vaccination in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.