ArticleBMC health services research2026
Economic value of physiotherapy interventions in headache management: a scoping review.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeadache disorders impose a substantial economic burden. Health economic evaluations are vital for informing healthcare decisions by assessing the costs and benefits of interventions, including physiotherapy. Evaluating the cost-benefit impact of integrating physiotherapy into headache management is therefore essential.
objectiveTo map studies including economic evaluations of physiotherapy interventions for headache management, defined as systematic comparisons of alternative treatments in terms of costs and outcomes.
methodsScoping review (PCC framework) conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INHTA databases (April 2026). Adults with headache receiving physiotherapy were included. Economic evaluations and cost measures were extracted. Studies were screened in two stages and synthesised descriptively. Reviews, trials, cohort, case report, case-control studies in English, Dutch, German were considered (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FVHXA ).
resultsPhysiotherapy, as monodisciplinary, part of an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach, was only included in eight out of 1271 studies. Interventions varied by setting (inpatient/outpatient) and delivery (individual/group). Three studies conducted cost-effectiveness analyses. A multimodal, interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach reduced medication-use, consultations, inpatient admissions (direct), and improved work status (indirect). However, evidence is insufficient to conclude that incorporating physiotherapy reduces healthcare costs.
conclusionA significant gap exists regarding the cost-reducing potential of physiotherapy in headache management. Rigorous economic analyses are needed to determine its clinical and economic value. Greater transparency and consensus on cost variables are recommended, along with investigation of which physiotherapy components yield optimal cost savings without compromising individual benefits. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.