Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106802›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Barriers and facilitators to telerehabilitation implementation: a mixed-methods study of German physiotherapists.

Marco Stahn, Martin Roemhild, Christian Kopkow, Anne-Kathrin Rausch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco StahnZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Institute of Applied Sciences Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland. marco.stahn@gmail.com.
Martin RoemhildInstitute of Evidence-Oriented-Medicine - FIEOM.de, Emmerthal, Germany.
Christian KopkowBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - Senftenberg, Faculty 4 - Institute of Health, Senftenberg, Germany.
Anne-Kathrin RauschZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Institute of Applied Sciences Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telehealth service adoption in physiotherapy, including telerehabilitation (TR). However, the extent of TR use and factors influencing its implementation in Germany remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate TR use in physiotherapy (during COVID-19 lockdowns, current use, future intentions, conditions treated, content, setting, and session type) and identify barriers and facilitators from physiotherapists' (PTs) perspectives.

methodsA mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed, combining a cross-sectional online survey (n = 152) with two focus group interviews (n = 9). The survey collected data on demographics, TR use, barriers, and facilitators. Focus groups explored themes emerging from the survey in greater depth. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated through explanatory linking and joint display in a comparative analysis table.

resultsTR use peaked during COVID-19 lockdown (32.26%) but decreased to 18.06% by October 2022, with 26.45% intending future use and 43.87% considering it. Among TR users, musculoskeletal conditions were most commonly treated (75%), followed by sports (38%), pulmonology (33%), and neurology (27%). The primary barrier was lack of physical examination (74% agreement). While technical challenges were not reported as a major barrier in the survey, interviews revealed significant concerns about insufficient internet bandwidth and technical infrastructure. Common reasons for using TR included promoting patient self-management (78% agreement) and broadening therapy options (69% agreement). Qualitative data identified additional implementation facilitators, including structured implementation processes, appropriate technical infrastructure, and patient involvement in decision-making.

conclusionWhile TR implementation in German physiotherapy shows growth potential, several barriers currently limit its adoption. Successful implementation requires addressing PTs capabilities, knowledge gaps, professional identity concerns, and environmental factors. Addressing these issues could enhance patient care quality, increase service accessibility, and advance healthcare delivery models.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physical TherapistsTelerehabilitationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesBarriersFacilitatorsMixed-methodsPhysiotherapyTelehealthTelerehabilitationTeletherapy

Identifiers

PMID42106802
PMCPMC13157660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.