ArticleBMC health services research2026
Lifestyle front offices in dutch hospitals: a cross-sectional survey on similarities, differences and future needs.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince 2019, Dutch hospitals have been developing approaches aiming to bridge the gap between hospital care and community-based lifestyle support. This has led to the introduction of the so called 'Lifestyle Front Office" (LFO) in 2022. The LFO enables healthcare professionals to refer patients for lifestyle and (psycho)social support adjacent to medical treatment in the context of specialist medical care. After a consultation at the LFO, patients are referred to the appropriate community-based lifestyle interventions. LFOs have been quickly adopted in Dutch hospitals, leading to conceptual differences. This study aimed to evaluate similarities, differences and future needs of LFOs in the Netherlands, striving for a more unified concept.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was sent out between December 2023 and September 2024 to all Dutch hospitals with an operational LFO (n = 17 hospitals). The survey focused on referral processes, patient eligibility criteria, departmental involvement, screening methods, consultation practices, follow-up procedures, financing, and capacity. The collected data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively to identify common practice, challenges, and opportunities for improvement.
resultsThe survey response rate was 82% (14/17). Primary referral groups were patients with lifestyle-related conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Most LFOs conducted pre-visit screenings by using questionnaires, employed lifestyle care coordinators with diverse professional backgrounds, utilized structured tools during consultations and used the electronic patient records for screening and communication. Future needs included the need for (long-term) funding, which was only secured in 21% of the LFOs. Furthermore, inconsistent eligibility criteria, limited capacity, and follow-up procedures were seen as priorities for future attention.
conclusionThis study highlights the similarities, differences and future needs of LFOs in the Netherlands. To achieve a more unified concept, LFOs need to better align patient-related eligibility criteria, use of structured tools, referral to community-based support, follow-up strategies and long-term funding. While the LFO concept emphasizes strong inter-organizational collaboration, further research is needed to assess its impact by investigating success rate of referrals and (long-term) health outcomes after referral. Additionally, for maintaining LFOs in the Dutch healthcare system, additional research is required to better understand the barriers and facilitators regarding structural implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.