ArticleBMC medical education2026
Design and practice of the "BOPPPS + PAD" blended learning model in teaching of surgical nursing.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical Nursing is a compulsory course for nursing major and plays a crucial role in cultivating nursing professionals. Currently, with the rapid development of educational technology, blended learning that deeply integrates information technology in surgical nursing teaching has become the normality.The study aimed to design and implementation of "Bridge-in、0bjective、Pre-assessment、Participatory Learning、Post-assessment、Summary (BOPPPS) + Presentation-Assimilation-Discussion(PAD)" blended Learning model in Surgical Nursing teaching, and evaluate Its effectiveness.
methodsA total of 363 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in 2021 and 2022 were selected as research subjects by using convenience sampling. The 188 students enrolled in 2021 formed the control group, while the 175 students enrolled in 2022 constituted the experimental group.For the control group students, instructors delivered surgical nursing instruction using traditional blended learning model which centered on classroom instruction supplemented by online resources. For the experimental group students, instructors implemented surgical nursing instruction through the "BOPPPS + PAD" blended teaching model. After completing the course, learning outcomes and course satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe course overal grades for students in the control group and experimental group were 78.00 ± 7.41 and 83.66 ± 9.42, respectively (t = -3.03, p < 0.01); The self-directed learning ability scores were 91.53 ± 16.08 and 103.81 ± 15.48, respectively (t = -4.97, p < 0.001); The critical thinking ability scores were 344.84 ± 43.78 and 376.84 ± 72.33, respectively (t = -3.35, p = 0.001); Active collaborative learning ability scores were 16.06 ± 4.57 and 18.56 ± 3.05, respectively (t = -3.67, P < 0.001). All results showed statistically significant differences. Course satisfaction among experimental group students was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05), indicating a statistically significant difference.
conclusionThe implementation of the "BOPPPS + PAD" blended learning model in Surgical Nursing teaching enhances students' academic performance and course satisfaction, while fostering their self-directed learning abilities, critical thinking abilities, and active collaborative learning capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.