Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106724›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026

Digital phenotyping for predicting relapse in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of passive sensing approaches.

Shih-Shuan Fang, Sheng-Han Chen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shih-Shuan FangDepartment of Geriatrics, Landseed International Hospital, No. 77, Guangtai Road, Pingzhen District, Taoyuan City, 324, Taiwan.
Sheng-Han ChenDepartment of Neurology, Landseed International Hospital, No. 77, Guangtai Road, Pingzhen District, Taoyuan City, 324, Taiwan. castal2008@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0007-7895-2617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital phenotyping - the moment-by-moment quantification of individual-level human behavior using data from personal digital devices - offers a novel approach to continuous, passive monitoring of psychiatric patients. Changes in behavioral digital phenotypes may serve as early warning signs of relapse or clinical deterioration, creating an opportunity for timely preventive intervention.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and IEEE Xplore was conducted for studies published up to January 2026. We included prospective and retrospective observational studies using passively collected smartphone or wearable data to predict relapse or clinical deterioration in individuals with diagnosed psychiatric disorders, with reported quantitative model performance metrics. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [16] and the PROBAST [25, 26] tool. Data were synthesized narratively in accordance with the SWiM guideline.

resultsFifty-two studies encompassing 4,814 participants met inclusion criteria. Disorders studied included schizophrenia spectrum disorders (35%), bipolar disorder (27%), and major depressive disorder (23%). Key predictive features included alterations in sleep patterns (83% of studies), physical activity (83%), GPS-derived mobility (75%), and social communication frequency (65%). Machine learning models reported AUC values ranging from 0.70 to 0.88 for predicting relapse one to four weeks in advance, although the majority of these estimates were derived from internal validation and are likely to overestimate real-world performance. Multi-modal data integration and individual-level modeling consistently outperformed single-modality and population-level approaches. High risk of bias was identified in 75% of studies, primarily attributable to inadequate analytic methodology and reliance on internal validation.

conclusionsPassive digital phenotyping demonstrates significant promise for predicting psychiatric relapse across diagnostic categories, with moderate-to-good predictive discrimination (AUC 0.70-0.88) achievable up to four weeks prior to confirmed relapse. However, substantial methodological limitations - including reliance on internal validation, heterogeneous outcome definitions, and limited demographic diversity - must be addressed. Standardized outcome definitions, prospective external validation in diverse cohorts, and closed-loop intervention trials are required before widespread clinical implementation can be responsibly pursued.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersWearable Electronic DevicesDigital HealthHumansPhenotypeRecurrenceSmartphoneBipolar disorderDepressionDigital phenotypingMachine learningPassive sensingPrediction modelPsychiatric relapseSchizophreniaSmartphoneWearable

Identifiers

PMID42106724
PMCPMC13330314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.