ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2026
Dynamic compliance of the CSF system in iNPH (Part I) - in vitro investigation of the impact of spinal canal stenoses.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal canal stenosis is an age-related degenerative condition observed mainly in the cervical and lumbar regions. Recent research has suggested that such stenoses influence cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients by increasing spinal canal flow resistance thereby directly impacting craniospinal dynamic compliance and intracranial pressure (ICP). This study experimentally investigates the effects of cervical and lumbar spinal stenoses on CSF dynamics using a validated in vitro model. To simulate varying degrees of stenosis, controlled reductions in the spinal canal cross-sectional area were applied, and resulting changes in bidirectional cervical CSF flow, ICP, and compliance were measured. The results indicate that mild to moderate stenoses have minimal impact on CSF dynamics, whereas severe stenoses (cervical < 33% and lumbar < 17% of initial cross sectional area) significantly alter CSF dynamics. These alterations were characterised by reduced dynamic compliance, decreased spinal CSF flow and increased ICP amplitudes up to 7.85 mmHg. These findings suggest that spinal stenoses critically alter key CSF dynamics, potentially contributing to iNPH. Further studies are required, especially on other influencing factors such as age-related changes in viscoelastic properties of the dural sac and the relevance of dynamic compliance of the CSF system, which will be addressed in Part II of this series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.