Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106718›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Comparison of modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane and anterior quadratus lumborum blocks for postoperative analgesia and recovery after lumbar transpedicular fixation surgery: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Tuba Yaman, Ahmet Murat Yayik, Mehmet Kursat Karadag, Mehmet Hakan Sahin, Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu, Erkan Cem Celik, Muhammed Enes Aydin, Ali Ahiskalioglu, Nagihan Si̇msek

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tuba YamanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hilvan Sehit Halit Siltak State Hospital, Sanlıurfa, Türkiye.
Ahmet Murat YayikDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye. m_yayik@hotmail.com.
Mehmet Kursat KaradagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erzurum State Hospital, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Mehmet Hakan SahinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medicana Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye.
Elif Oral AhiskaliogluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Erkan Cem CelikDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Muhammed Enes AydinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Ali AhiskaliogluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Nagihan Si̇msekDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bayburt State Hospital, Bayburt, Türkiye.

Funding

Atatürk University Scientific Research Project Coordinator TTU-2022-10821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective postoperative analgesia after lumbar transpedicular fixation (TPF) surgery remains challenging because of extensive tissue trauma and high nociceptive burden. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have emerged as important components of multimodal analgesia in spinal surgery. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, opioid consumption, technical performance, and quality of recovery associated with the modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block versus the anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in patients undergoing two- or three-level lumbar TPF surgery.

methodsIn this prospective, randomized, single-center trial, 100 patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for two- or three-level lumbar TPF surgery were randomly assigned to receive bilateral ultrasound-guided mTLIP (n = 50) or anterior QLB (n = 50) in addition to standardized general anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was cumulative fentanyl consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included interval opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, time to first analgesic request, block performance characteristics, opioid-related adverse effects, and quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire.

resultsBaseline demographic and surgical characteristics were comparable between groups. Fentanyl consumption during the first 4 postoperative hours was significantly lower in the mTLIP group compared with the QLB group (75 [50-125] µg vs. 125 [75-175] µg; p = 0.017). Opioid consumption during the 4-8 h and 8-24 h intervals, as well as total 24-hour fentanyl consumption, did not differ significantly between groups. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, time to first analgesic request, additional analgesic requirements, QoR-15 scores, and opioid-related adverse effects were similar. The mTLIP block demonstrated significantly shorter performance time and superior needle visualization compared with QLB (p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn patients undergoing multi-level lumbar TPF surgery, the mTLIP block provided superior opioid-sparing analgesia in the early postoperative period compared with anterior QLB, while overall analgesic efficacy and quality of recovery were comparable thereafter. Improved technical performance and procedural efficiency may favor mTLIP as a practical regional analgesia option in extensive lumbar spinal surgery.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeNerve BlockPostoperative PainAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesics, OpioidModified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane BlockPostoperative AnalgesiaQuadratus Lumborum BlocksSpinal SurgeryTranspedicular Screw Fixation Surgery

Identifiers

PMID42106718
PMCPMC13330336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.