ArticleBMC health services research2026
Perceived organizational support profiles and their moderating role in the association between emotional labor and work engagement among Chinese healthcare workers: a latent profile analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmotional labor is a common job demand in healthcare and may reduce healthcare workers' work engagement, potentially affecting workforce sustainability and service quality. Perceived organizational support (POS) may buffer this adverse effect, yet its potential latent heterogeneity is often overlooked. This study aimed to identify latent POS profiles and examine whether these profiles moderate the association between emotional labor and work engagement among Chinese healthcare workers.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted between August and November 2023 among 1503 healthcare workers from 16 tertiary public hospitals in Shandong Province, China. POS was measured using the 24-item Chinese Employee Perceived Organizational Support Scale, WE was assessed with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and emotional labor was measured using the Emotional Labor Scale. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify POS profiles. Multivariable ordinary least squares regression models examined associations and moderating effects. Supplementary analyses examined moderation using continuous POS measures and restricted cubic spline models.
resultsThree distinct POS profiles were identified: low (18.1%), medium (52.0%), and high (29.9%). Emotional labor was significantly negatively associated with work engagement (β = -0.35, p < 0.001). Compared with the low POS profile, healthcare workers in the medium (β = 10.65, 95% CI: 8.61-12.70, p < 0.001) and high (β = 21.74, 95% CI: 19.34-24.14, p < 0.001) profiles reported higher work engagement. Moderation analyses showed that the negative association between emotional labor and WE was significantly attenuated in the high POS profile (interaction β = 0.43, p < 0.001), whereas the medium POS profile did not show a significant buffering effect (interaction β = 0.11, p = 0.226). Findings were consistent when POS was modeled as a continuous variable, and restricted cubic spline analyses suggested that the buffering effect of POS may become more pronounced at higher levels of support.
conclusionPOS showed clear latent heterogeneity and may function as an important buffering resource in the association between emotional labor and work engagement. Strengthening organizational support systems, particularly for employees with low perceived support, may help sustain work engagement in high-demand healthcare settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.