ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Parental awareness and practices regarding male circumcision timing, setting, and providers: a multicenter cross-sectional survey from Turkey (n = 637).
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate Turkish parents' perceptions and attitudes regarding the appropriate age for circumcision, practice conditions, and procedural indications across different regions of Turkey.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey study was conducted between March 2023 and March 2025 across urology and pediatric surgery departments in seven distinct regions of Turkey. A total of 637 literate parents (aged ≥ 18) completed a voluntary 16-question online survey via a URL or QR code. Subgroup analysis was performed for parents whose sons had already undergone circumcision (n = 404). Data regarding demographics, circumcision preferences, and information sources were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests.
resultsThe majority of parents (95.1%) considered circumcision necessary, primarily citing religious (77.7%) and medical (63.8%) reasons. Overall, 76% of participants stated that circumcision should ideally occur outside the psychologically sensitive period (PSP; ages 2-6). Among the 404 parents with already-circumcised sons, 41.1% (n = 166) reported that the procedure was performed during the PSP (ages 2-6). Awareness of the non-PSP increased significantly with higher parental education levels (p < 0.001). Regarding practice, specialists were preferred (pediatric surgeons 54.4%; pediatric urologists 46.3%), and the operating room was identified as the safest setting by 91.7% of respondents. Local anesthesia was the most preferred method (51.6%).
conclusionDespite high awareness regarding specialist qualifications and clinical settings, a significant "knowledge-practice gap" exists concerning the timing of circumcision. Clinicians should proactively counsel parents regarding the psychological risks associated with the PSP, and public health strategies must move beyond general awareness to provide targeted guidance that ensures optimal timing in circumcision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.