Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106679›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Beyond labels: current sequencing data do not support standardized porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) genotypes.

Giovanni Franzo, Joaquim Segalés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giovanni FranzoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy. giovanni.franzo@unipd.it.
Joaquim SegalésDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, UAB, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPorcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) has been detected worldwide in both healthy and diseased pigs, raising questions about its molecular diversity and potential genotype structure. Since its discovery, several genotyping schemes have been proposed; however, most of them rely on arbitrary criteria and often produce inconsistent or conflicting classifications.

resultsIn this study, all high-quality PCV3 ORF2 sequences available at the GenBank to date were analyzed to evaluate whether consistent and reproducible genotyping criteria can be defined. Phylogenetic trees reconstructed using multiple algorithms and statistical comparisons of topological similarity revealed moderate-to-high incongruence among methods, limited phylogenetic signal, and a general decline in bootstrap support toward deeper nodes. Genetic distance distributions showed complete overlap between and within proposed genotypes, further questioning the biological meaning of such partitions.

conclusionsOverall, these findings indicate that the current genetic landscape of PCV3 does not support a robust or standardized genotyping framework. Given the low genetic variability of PCV3 and the absence of experimental evidence for genotype-specific differences in antigenicity, epidemiology, or virulence, the definition of formal genotypes appears challenging and premature, and likely unnecessary at this stage.

Indexed as

Circoviridae InfectionsCircovirusAnimalsGenetic VariationGenotypePhylogenySwineClassificationGenotypesPCV3Phylogeny

Identifiers

PMID42106679
PMCPMC13330278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.