ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Network structure of depression and anxiety symptoms with psychosocial factors among Chinese women with primary infertility: a multi-center cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen with primary infertility experience elevated psychological distress, yet the interplay between individual symptoms and psychosocial factors remains unclear. This study aimed to identify central and bridge symptoms within a network of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial factors in Chinese women with primary infertility.
methodsA total of 1,062 women with primary infertility were recruited from four reproductive medicine centers in China between February and December 2025. Depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), perceived stress (PSS-10), fertility-specific stress (COMPI-FPSS-SF), infertility stigma (ISS), social support (MSPSS), and resilience (CD-RISC-10) were assessed. Network analysis using regularized partial correlation networks was conducted to estimate network structure, centrality, bridge centrality, and predictability.
resultsOf the participants, 9.6% met clinical thresholds for depression and 5.3% for anxiety. Difficulty relaxing exhibited the highest centrality among symptoms. Public stigma showed the strongest centrality among psychosocial factors, with a robust connection to family stigma (edge weight = 0.538). Perceived stress emerged as the primary bridge linking psychosocial factors to symptoms (bridge expected influence = 0.297), followed by fertility-specific stress (bridge expected influence = 0.143). Guilt was the key bridge symptom (bridge expected influence = 0.086). Resilience showed the strongest negative association with perceived stress (edge weight = - 0.275). Network stability was excellent (CS-coefficient = 0.75).
conclusionsDifficulty relaxing, perceived stress, and guilt emerged as potentially important nodes that warrant further investigation as candidate intervention targets for psychological distress in women with primary infertility. Interventions targeting relaxation training, stress appraisal, and self-compassion, alongside resilience enhancement, warrant further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.