ArticleBMC women's health2026
Women's reasoning and experience in the cervical cancer screening programme when offered a self-sampling HPV test: a qualitative content analysis.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur aim was to explore the reasoning and experiences of women when offered a self-sampling HPV test.
methodsThis study implemented a qualitative study design and content analysis using an inductive approach. Data consisted of written narratives collected through open-ended questions from a total of 173 women. Women were included if they had been offered a self-sampling device since September 2021 and were southern Sweden residents. To achieve purposive sampling with maximum variation, attenders adhering to the screening programme, nonattenders (absent for at least two screening rounds), and women with cervical dysplasia were recruited.
resultsThe content analysis generated seven categories: (1) unpleasant experience with a vaginal examination; (2) gratefulness and acceptability of self-sampling; (3) varied perception of one's capacity to perform self-sampling; (4) preference for cervical sampling by healthcare professionals; (5) anxiety and fear concerning a potential or detected HPV infection; (6) different risk assessments for acquiring an HPV infection; and (7) negative impact on mental well-being due to cervical dysplasia. The overarching theme became "the HPV self-sampling reduced practical and emotional barriers to attending the cervical cancer screening programme, but test results may create anxiety."
conclusionsMost women valued HPV self-sampling, although their confidence in performing it varied. Self-sampling can reduce the emotional and practical barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening. However, anxiety about cervical dysplasia or following a positive HPV test was noted, highlighting the need for healthcare professionals to provide personalised information to alleviate negative emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.