Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106661›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

Women's reasoning and experience in the cervical cancer screening programme when offered a self-sampling HPV test: a qualitative content analysis.

Caroline Hellsten, Lina Magnusson, Christer Borgfeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline HellstenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Department of Clinical Science Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, SE-221 85, Sweden. caroline.antgren_hellsten@med.lu.se.
Lina MagnussonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Christer BorgfeldtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to explore the reasoning and experiences of women when offered a self-sampling HPV test.

methodsThis study implemented a qualitative study design and content analysis using an inductive approach. Data consisted of written narratives collected through open-ended questions from a total of 173 women. Women were included if they had been offered a self-sampling device since September 2021 and were southern Sweden residents. To achieve purposive sampling with maximum variation, attenders adhering to the screening programme, nonattenders (absent for at least two screening rounds), and women with cervical dysplasia were recruited.

resultsThe content analysis generated seven categories: (1) unpleasant experience with a vaginal examination; (2) gratefulness and acceptability of self-sampling; (3) varied perception of one's capacity to perform self-sampling; (4) preference for cervical sampling by healthcare professionals; (5) anxiety and fear concerning a potential or detected HPV infection; (6) different risk assessments for acquiring an HPV infection; and (7) negative impact on mental well-being due to cervical dysplasia. The overarching theme became "the HPV self-sampling reduced practical and emotional barriers to attending the cervical cancer screening programme, but test results may create anxiety."

conclusionsMost women valued HPV self-sampling, although their confidence in performing it varied. Self-sampling can reduce the emotional and practical barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening. However, anxiety about cervical dysplasia or following a positive HPV test was noted, highlighting the need for healthcare professionals to provide personalised information to alleviate negative emotions.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf CareSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsAdultFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenUterine Cervical DysplasiaAcceptabilityExperienceHPV self-sampling

Identifiers

PMID42106661
PMCPMC13159341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.