Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106656›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2026

Cinnarizine vs. topiramate for migraine prophylaxis in children: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial.

Alireza Abdi, Ezatollah Abbasi, Aisan Abazarlou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alireza AbdiDepartment of pediatric diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-2290
Ezatollah AbbasiDepartment of pediatric diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. ezatolahabasi1353@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-2911
Aisan AbazarlouDepartment of pediatric diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8945-1638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMigraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder in children, often requiring preventive treatment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of cinnarizine and topiramate in the prophylaxis of migraine in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial, 96 children aged 6-15 years with a diagnosis of migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) [1], including both migraine with and without aura, without restriction to specific subtypes were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either cinnarizine (25 mg once daily) or topiramate (25 mg once daily) for 12 weeks. Migraine attack frequency and severity were recorded using headache diaries at baseline, one month, and three months after treatment initiation. The primary outcome was the change in monthly migraine attack frequency. Secondary outcomes included changes in headache severity and the occurrence of adverse events. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and within-group changes over time were analyzed using the Friedman test.

resultsBoth cinnarizine and topiramate significantly reduced monthly migraine attack frequency and headache severity over the 12-week treatment period (P < 0.001 for within-group comparisons). At three months, the median number of migraine attacks decreased to two attacks per month in both groups, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two treatments (P = 0.81). Headache severity scores also improved significantly in both groups, and no between-group differences were observed at follow-up (P = 0.74). Both medications were generally well tolerated, with no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between groups. Appetite reduction was reported in 4.2% of the cinnarizine group versus 14.6% of the topiramate group. While a numerically lower incidence of appetite reduction was observed in the cinnarizine group (4.2% vs. 14.6%), this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.159, Fisher's exact test; OR = 0.255, 95% CI: 0.05-1.27).

conclusionBoth cinnarizine and topiramate significantly reduced the frequency and severity of migraine attacks in children. No statistically significant difference in efficacy was detected between the two treatments. A numerically lower incidence of appetite reduction was observed with cinnarizine, although this difference was not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed to evaluate potential differences in tolerability.

trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) IRCT20221108056444N1. Registered 12 February 2023 Retrospectively registered, https://www.en.irct.ir/trial/66774 .

Indexed as

CinnarizineFructoseMigraine DisordersTopiramateAdolescentChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeCinnarizineFructoseTopiramateCinnarizineEfficacyMigraineMigraine ProphylaxisPediatricTolerabilityTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID42106656
PMCPMC13196016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.