ArticleBMC public health2026
Trapped in harmful work? How psychosocial job exposure, sex, and education shape occupational mobility in Norway.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the health risks of psychosocial job exposure are well established, the extent to which workers reduce exposure by changing occupations remains unclear. This study examines whether Norwegian workers in high-exposure occupations are more likely to change their occupation compared to those in lower-exposure occupations, whether such changes lead to less exposure, and whether these patterns vary by educational attainment and sex.
methodsComprehensive Norwegian register data were linked to a validated, sex-specific psychosocial job exposure index covering 322 occupations to track occupational mobility across different exposure levels from 2006 to 2019. Linear probability models were used to estimate the likelihood of mobility from one year to the next and, amongst those who changed, moving to an occupation with lower exposure. To assess whether observed patterns were driven by large, female-dominated professions, further analyses excluding teaching and health care occupations were estimated. All analyses were stratified by sex, and estimates were reported both overall and by educational level.
resultsWorkers in high-exposure occupations were less mobile than workers in lower-exposure occupations. However, much of this pattern was largely shaped by the concentration of highly-educated women in teaching and health care. Among those who changed occupations, women were more likely than men to move into occupations with lower exposure, even when excluding teachers and health care workers. Although the differences weakened when teaching and health care occupations were excluded, higher education did not increase the likelihood of moving into lower-exposure occupations for either sex.
conclusionsHigher psychosocial exposure is associated with lower occupational mobility in the Norwegian workforce. The low mobility observed among highly-educated women in high-exposure occupation is largely shaped by their concentration in teaching and health care. Taken together, the findings suggests that exposure, sex and education interact in ways that may limit movement out of high-exposure work, particularly for certain occupational groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.