Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106611›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Building rehabilitation care capacity for older adults living in long-term care through family/care partner and physical therapist engagement: a scoping review.

Alexander J Stephen, Denise M Connelly, Nicole A Guitar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander J StephenHealth and Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Denise M ConnellySchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada. dconnell@uwo.ca.
Nicole A GuitarSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults living in long-term care homes often experience impairment in mobility and function requiring physical therapy rehabilitation. Maintaining residents' physical function can promote quality of life, reduce pain and skin breakdown, and support the provision of personal care. Family/care partners notably contribute to resident well-being. Understanding engagement between physical therapists and family/care partners is essential to advancing resident rehabilitation and health outcomes, particularly as staffing capacity, time, and access to rehabilitation services become increasingly constrained. This review aimed to synthesise and assess the quality of the literature describing engagement between physical therapists and family/care partners of older adults in long-term care.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Six databases and grey literature were searched without date restrictions. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they: (1) described engagement between physical therapists and family/care partners as reported by any participant group; (2) were conducted in a long-term care home or equivalent setting; (3) focused on physical rehabilitation for older adults; and (4) were available in English. Any study design was eligible. Data were analysed thematically and methodological quality was assessed.

resultsOf 3443 papers and records screened, nine studies were included. Most (n=8) were qualitative and conducted in high-income countries and all were rated as "good" quality. Four themes surfaced describing engagement between physical therapists and family/care partners in long-term care: (1) physical therapists support greater family/care partner involvement in rehabilitation; (2) opportunities to enhance structured communication between physical therapists and family/care partners; (3) misalignment of family/care partner expectations with physical therapy service capacity; and (4) enhancing role clarity and value of family/care partners in rehabilitation.

conclusionEngagement between physical therapists and family/care partners in long-term care homes is underdeveloped despite recognition of its potential benefits. Clearer role definitions, structured communication, and supportive organisational policies are needed to enhance collaboration, reduce caregiver burden, and support manageable physical therapist workloads. Strengthening these partnerships could improve rehabilitation processes, resident health outcomes, and sustainability of long-term care services.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyLong-Term CarePhysical TherapistsAgedHumansCaregiverFamily/care partnerLong-term carePhysical therapistsReview

Identifiers

PMID42106611
PMCPMC13326099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.