ArticleBMC genomics2026
Population genomic assessment of semi-captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) from Myanmar: endangered species management and conservation implications.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic approaches can provide critical insights into the genetic health of endangered species and the impacts of long-term management on semi-captive populations. Asian elephants (Elephas maximus), listed as Endangered, include a large semi-captive population in Myanmar that may represent an important reservoir of genetic diversity. However, their genetic structure, levels of inbreeding, and relatedness remain poorly characterized.
resultsWe assembled the largest genomic dataset to date for semi-captive Asian elephants, comprising reduced representation data (RADseq, N = 261) and whole-genome data (WGS, N = 64). Heterozygosity values showed no significant differences between wild-born and captive-born individuals. Both RADseq and WGS data revealed low to medium levels of inbreeding and no evidence of an increase among younger generations. Population structure analyses confirmed a homogeneous population with no geographic-based genetic structure, likely reflecting management practices and natural mating with wild bulls. Demographic inference indicated a sharp decline in effective population size (Ne) between 60 and 30 generations ago, consistent with a long-term population contraction, and current Ne was estimated as being very low. Relatedness analyses identified 657 first-cousin or closer relationships, including 124 first-degree pairs. We also uncovered 35 previously undocumented father-offspring pairs with some males having disproportionately high reproductive success. To facilitate future monitoring, we developed three reduced relatedness-informative marker (RIM) panels. The smallest panel (274 SNPs) provided sufficient resolution for reliable parentage assignment at reduced cost.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate how genomic tools uncovered the genetic consequences of management of the largest semi-captive elephant population of Myanmar, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring to safeguard its genetic diversity. More broadly, this study illustrates how integrating WGS and RADseq can inform conservation planning for semi-managed populations and offers transferable approaches applicable to other endangered species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.