ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Quantitative biomechanical analysis of sharp force injuries to the head using finite element simulation.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population genetics of 37 Y-STR loci in Tibeto-Burman-speaking Yuxi Yi population from Yunnan Province, Southwest China.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Population genetics of 37 Y-STR loci in Tibeto-Burman-speaking Yuxi Yi population from Yunnan Province, Southwest China.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- From finite-element reconstruction to court-ready biomechanics: a validation passport for sharp-force head injury simulation.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sharp force injury cases, assessments of applied force and injury severity primarily rely on empirical judgment, lacking quantitative and objective data support. This study aims to construct a high-fidelity finite element (FE) head model, validate it using 3D-printed biomimetic skull experiments, and investigate the relationship between momentum and injury severity in sharp instrument stabs to the head, thereby providing scientific evidence for case analysis. A high-fidelity FE head model was reconstructed based on the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) model. Biomimetic skulls were 3D-printed using PEEK material. Experimental data obtained from slashing with a Chinese kitchen knife were collected via sensors and motion capture systems, using the erosion failure model to simulate wound formation. Following model validation, the approach was applied to a real stabbing fatality case to systematically simulate stabbing processes under varying momenta (0.75-11.25 kg·m/s). FE model validation demonstrated close alignment between simulation and experimental results, with errors in wound dimensions and slashing force within 15.0%. Case reconstruction revealed that the minimum momentum required to reproduce penetrating injury in the homicide case was 9.75 kg·m/s. In the present simulation framework, momentum values of 0.75 kg·m/s, 2.25 kg·m/s, and 5.25 kg·m/s were associated with minor, moderate, and serious skull injuries, respectively. This study provides a biomechanical framework for quantitative simulation and illustrative case reconstruction of sharp force injuries. The real-case application serves primarily as an example of the proposed biomechanical reconstruction approach, which may enhance the objectivity of injury severity assessment when integrated with other forensic evidence and provide reproducible biomechanical support for case investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42106576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.