ArticleScientific reports2026
Community use of oral rehydration solution and antibiotics for diarrhea in the Far North and Littoral regions of Cameroon: distribution and determinants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diarrhea is a significant health issue in low- and middle-income countries. There is an urgent need to identify and implement actions aimed at reducing the associated mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and determinants of home use of oral rehydration solution (ORS) and antibiotics for the treatment of diarrheal diseases in the Far North and Littoral regions of Cameroon. This was a cross-sectional study using sentinel surveillance data collected from four health facilities in the cities of Kousseri and Douala in Cameroon. The study targeted patients seeking consultations for diarrhea at these health facilities. Patients were selected through consecutive sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire administered face-to-face by a trained nurse, which included questions about the reason for consultation, socio-demographic characteristics, and prior exposure to ORS and antibiotics before arriving at the health facility. A total of 1,065 patients with diarrhea agreed to participate in the study, including 160 (15.0%) from Kousseri and 905 (85.0%) from Douala. Of the 1,065 participants, 215 (20.2%) and 637 (59.8%) reported using ORS and antibiotics at home as part of their diarrhea treatment prior to arriving at the health facility. The most used antibiotics were metronidazole (31.9%), amoxicillin (3.6%), doxycycline (3.6%), and ciprofloxacin (2.6%).The use of ORS was associated with place of residence (aOR = 0.20; 95% CI [0.10 - 0.40]), and duration of diarrhea (aOR = 0.51; 95% CI [0.33 - 0.78]) were associated with home use of ORS among patients with diarrhea. The city of residence (aOR = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.85 - 5.05) and the absence of ORS use at home (aOR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.30-3.62); having diarrhea for less than 24 h (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.24 - 0.54]) and traveling less than one hour to reach the health facility (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI = [0.21 - 0.91]) were associated with home use of antibiotics among patients with diarrhea. The frequency of antibiotic use in the community is significantly high, while the utilization of ORS remains low. More efforts are required to enhance community management of diarrhea effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.