ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Clinical phenotypes and treatment patterns in men with chronic pelvic pain: a tertiary referral cohort.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMen with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) have heterogeneous symptoms and variable responses to treatment. We sought to identify clinical and treatment factors associated with pain improvement. Specifically, which presenting features and management strategies are associated with clinically meaningful reductions in pain among men with CP/CPPS?
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of men evaluated for chronic pelvic or genitourinary pain by a single specialist from February 2023 to July 2025. Patients were included based on ICD codes for pelvic pain, genitourinary pain, or chronic prostatitis. Demographics, presenting symptoms, and initial and most recent visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were collected. Intervention types were compared by analyzing VAS scores before and after receiving an intervention.
results157 men were included, of which 103 had follow-up VAS data. The median follow up was 277 days and median symptom duration prior to presentation was 24 months. Diffuse pelvic pain was the most common phenotype (51.6%). The mean baseline and most recent VAS scores were 3.4 and 2.1, respectively. The greatest improvements were associated with penile block (- 3.8), spermatic cord block (- 2.6), and hydrodistension with cautery of ulcers (- 2.6). Cystoscopy was performed in 26.8% of patients. While often non-diagnostic (31%), cystoscopy frequently diagnosed inflammatory lesions (31%) and BPH (19%).
conclusionMost patients with CP/CPPS experienced clinically meaningful pain reduction following subspecialist evaluation. Diffuse pain without clear triggers is common. Greater improvement with nerve blocks and treatment of Hunner's lesions supports a phenotype-driven approach. However, studies are needed to isolate and validate treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42106502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.