ArticleSpine deformity2026
The impact of osteoporosis on preoperative presentation in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing surgical correction: a retrospective study.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOsteoporosis is common in adults with spinal deformity (ASD) and may worsen baseline malalignment and disability. Because these conditions often coexist, understanding how osteoporosis and patients meeting criteria for high risk of osteoporosis affect deformity severity and quality of life is key to improving outcomes.
methodsAdults (≥ 18 years) undergoing ASD surgery with complete baseline and two-year follow-up data were stratified into osteoporosis, high-risk, and non-osteoporotic cohorts. Osteoporosis was defined by preexisting diagnosis; high-risk by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) criteria (female ≥ 65 years or risk factors: steroids, chronic kidney disease, alcohol use, vitamin D deficiency, limited mobility, diabetes). Non-osteoporotic patients had normal bone quality. Baseline alignment was evaluated using Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP) and Sagittal Age-Adjusted Score (SAAS). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analyzed using multivariable regression adjusted for age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and modified Fragility Index (mFI).
resultsAmong 899 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 15.0 years; 74% female; BMI 27.5 ± 5.8 kg/m
conclusionASD patients with osteoporosis or high-risk features exhibit poorer quality of life and more severe deformity at baseline, as inadequate bone health remains independently associated with worse radiographic alignment and greater disability after adjustment for confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42106499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.