Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106481›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Flow dynamics and pressure modulation in a patient-specific upper airway using a pulsating nasal jet.

Muhammad Aseem, Elias Sundström, Liran Oren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad AseemDepatment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, 598 Rhodes Hall, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Elias SundströmDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, FLOW, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Liran OrenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Medical Science Building, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. liran.oren@uc.edu.

Funding

Using vortical airflow to pressurize the upper airway without a tight seal during CPAP therapyR33HL161814 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI OREN, LIRAN · 2023 to 2024
$637k
NIH/NHLBI R33HL161814Swedish Research Council 2021-04894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsating airflow jets delivered via nasal cannula offer a promising, comfortable, non-invasive alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the fluid dynamic mechanisms by which pulsatile flow influences upper airway pressure remain poorly understood in anatomically realistic geometries. This study used large eddy simulations (LES) to examine pressure and flow characteristics of pulsating nasal jets within a patient-specific upper airway model. Two airflow conditions were simulated: (1) steady high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at 40 L/min and (2) pulsatile flow at 20 Hz with a 30% duty cycle, matched to the same mean flow rate. Each pulse generated a vortex ring that impinged on the nasal walls, creating localized high-pressure regions and asymmetric shear stress. Compared to steady flow, the pulsatile jet increased time-averaged pharyngeal pressure by up to 50%. Spectral analysis revealed that the 20 Hz pressure oscillations were primarily confined to the upper airway, with substantial attenuation through the pharyngeal-laryngeal region and negligible coherent oscillatory content by the trachea. These effects, shaped by jet-wall interactions in complex anatomy, diverge from classical vortex dynamics. Pulsatile nasal flow may offer a precise, geometry-responsive method for upper airway stabilization, suggesting a path toward a more tolerable, mask-free alternative to CPAP for OSA therapy.

Indexed as

Pulsatile FlowSleep Apnea, ObstructiveCannulaComputer SimulationContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansHydrodynamicsPharynxPressure

Identifiers

PMID42106481
PMCPMC13346588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.