ArticleCommunications biology2026
Proximity and current alignment drive fertilisation success in a broadcast-spawning coral (Acropora cf. hyacinthus).
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proximity and current alignment drive fertilisation success in a broadcast-spawning coral (Acropora cf. hyacinthus).Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As populations decline under climate change and other stressors, survivors become increasingly isolated. Allee effects in such fragmented populations may arise during reproduction, particularly for sessile organisms such as corals, reducing fertilisation potential and increasing the probability of recruitment failure. However, the critical distances between corals needed to maintain viable populations remains uncertain. We experimentally investigated fertilisation patterns in the broadcast spawning coral Acropora cf. hyacinthus using a manipulated patch, spacing colonies at increasing distances downstream from a central spawning aggregation. Field samples showed a steep decline in fertilisation with increasing intercolonial distance and genetic paternity analysis indicated most parents were located within 3 m of each other. Colony position relative to the current direction also influenced fertilisation success, with 81% of sequenced progeny sired by upstream colonies. Simulations projecting natural population distributions onto a virtual grid, incorporating experimental results, indicated that populations remained well-mixed at typical adult densities. Yet at reduced densities approaching 0.01 colonies m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.