ArticleScientific reports2026
Compressive strength of mortar incorporating recycled nonmetallic printed circuit board waste: experimental and interpretable machine learning analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When disposed of in landfills, printed circuit boards (PCBs) release hazardous substances. Furthermore, the global sand crisis has gained considerable attention among environmentalists over the last few years, and the United Nations has proposed some initiatives to reduce the use of river sand. Despite the existence of several promising sustainable alternatives to alluvial sand, there has been little effort to implement those initiatives in the construction industry. This study explores the use of recycled non-metallic PCB (NM-PCB) as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in mortar, combined with silica fume and marble powder. No data on their combined effects on mortar properties has been discovered yet which restricted large-scale application of NM-PCB in the construction industry. Therefore, this study investigates the potential of machine learning (ML) to predict the compressive strength (CS) of mortar containing NM-PCB, silica fume, and marble powder, as CS is the most critical property of concrete. A comprehensive experimental dataset of 270 samples was developed with eight (8) input variables, with compressive strength as the output. Due to the significant pozzolanic activity of silica fume and the micro filler effect of marble powder, their optimal dosage in mortar was determined using machine learning. The highest Compressive Strength (CS) achieved was 17.6 MPa in a mix containing 5% SF, 5% MP and 3% NM-PCB. Linear Regression, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting models were applied to predict compressive strength, with RF and XGB optimized via grid search and validated using k-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using R², RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. The Random Forest model was the most accurate, achieving an R² of 0.96, while XGBoost also performed well with R² = 0.90. SHAP analysis showed that silica fume (7-12 kg/m³) and NM-PCB (13-22 kg/m³) enhance compressive strength when combined with over 360 kg/m³ of cement. ICE and PDP analyses highlighted curing age as the most influential factor, with silica fume, water-cement ratio, and superplasticizer dosage also significantly affecting strength. A graphical user interface was developed as a decision-support tool for researchers and preliminary mix design optimization for practitioners and externally validated with experimental results demonstrating that recycling NM-PCB in concrete promotes sustainable construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.