ArticleScientific data2026
A dataset of clinical pediatric brain MRI with and without motion correction.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A dataset of clinical pediatric brain MRI with and without motion correction.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motion-induced artefacts are a common challenge in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), often degrading image quality and leading to frequent use of sedation or general anesthesia (GA) to minimise movement and ensure image clarity. However, repeated exposure to GA raises both logistical challenges and potential neurodevelopmental concerns. This dataset includes cerebral MRI scans from 47 children aged 4 to 11 years, who were clinically referred for imaging under GA. The participants were trained and afterwards imaging was performed without GA. MRI scans were acquired with or without motion correction using a marker-less tracking system integrated into the standard clinical workflow. Each MRI sequence is accompanied by radiologist-based quality ratings, automated reference-free quality metrics, and motion traces. For standardisation, all image data are structured in compliance with the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) format. This dataset provides a valuable benchmark for testing image-based motion correction methods and developing motion-tolerant imaging strategies, addressing a critical gap in a publicly available clinical pediatric MRI data acquired under realistic motion conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.