Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106422›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Lime-fly ash binder composition controls freeze-thaw durability of stabilized clays.

Emrah Dağlı, Ömer Faruk Çapar, Sedat Sert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emrah DağlıDepartment of Civil Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey. emrahdagli@beun.edu.tr.
Ömer Faruk ÇaparDepartment of Civil Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey.
Sedat SertDepartment of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Funding

Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Türkiye 2017-37891158-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the effects of freeze-thaw (F-T) cycles on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of untreated and stabilized soils using fly ash, lime, and lime-fly ash mixtures (30% FA, 5% L, and 30% FA + 5% L). Specimens were subjected to 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 F-T cycles. Fly ash-only mixtures showed a continuous reduction in UCS with increasing cycles, whereas lime and lime-fly ash mixtures exhibited higher resistance to F-T deterioration. Strength remained relatively stable up to six cycles, followed by a noticeable decline; however, lime-treated samples maintained higher UCS than untreated soils even after 12 cycles. For S30FA5L, S5L, and B5L mixtures, UCS increased by approximately 27-35% during the 2nd to 4th cycles. Lime-treated soils exhibited higher strength and more brittle behavior, while lime-fly ash mixtures showed more ductile responses. Although fly ash addition did not significantly enhance strength compared to lime alone, it improved ductility. Furthermore, strength enhancement became more pronounced when CaO > 7.7%, CaO/Al₂O₃ > 0.44, CaO/SiO₂ > 0.13, and CaO/(Al₂O₃ + SiO₂) > 0.10. These findings highlight the importance of oxide composition and calcium availability in governing freeze-thaw durability of stabilized clays.

Identifiers

PMID42106422
PMCPMC13346604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.