ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable blind image quality assessment with closed-loop semantic guidance and distortion diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In large-scale visual systems, particularly in automated image triage and preprocessing pipelines, the reliability of downstream computer vision tasks depends on the quality of perceptual inputs and the interpretability of assessment outcomes. Existing blind image quality assessment methods are typically formulated as offline black-box predictors that produce a single scalar score. While indicating degradation, it provides limited actionable guidance, semantic awareness, and insufficient diagnostic information for system-level decision-making. To address these limitations, this work proposes an interpretable blind image quality assessment framework designed to serve as a perceptual monitoring component that provides diagnostic support for automated visual systems. The approach incorporates high-level semantic priors from a frozen vision-language model into a Vision Transformer-based assessment stream via feature-wise linear modulation, enabling content-aware quality evaluation. In parallel, a distortion diagnosis branch is jointly optimized to identify dominant degradation types and generate structured diagnostic cues that support adaptive restoration. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate strong consistency with human subjective judgments, achieving Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of 0.9509 on TID2013 and 0.9408 on KADID-10k. The model also operates at 65 frames per second, indicating a favorable balance between accuracy, interpretability, and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.