Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106411›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A decision making algorithm for enhancing consumer value in purchasing behavior based on circular spherical fuzzy CRITIC WASPAS method.

Rui Zhang, Xiaoshuo Li, Wenjia Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Business Administration, School of Business, North Minzu University, Yinchuam, 750021, Ningxia, China. tgzyyx1223@163.com.
Xiaoshuo LiDepartment of Business Administration, School of Business, North Minzu University, Yinchuam, 750021, Ningxia, China.
Wenjia YiDepartment of Business Administration, School of Business, North Minzu University, Yinchuam, 750021, Ningxia, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problems of consumer value in purchasing behavior are usually associated with their high degree of uncertainty, hesitation, and contradicting opinions among the decision-makers. Conventional fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy models cannot adequately represent such an achievement and directional uncertainty. Given this limitation, the study offers a novel hybrid multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) model that integrates weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) and criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) models into the circular spherical fuzzy set (CSFS) framework. The objective aspect of the proposed method is that it employs the CRITIC method to calculate the weight of the attributes based on the intensity of contrast, and the weighted product model is used to view the summation of the weighted attributes and product models. By doing so, the WASPAS method produces a strong alternative ranking. Representation of membership, abstinence, non-membership, and radius-based hesitation can be more expressive in the CSFS environment, which reflects the uncertainty of decision-makers in a more realistic way. The relevance and suitability of the proposed model are applied to a hypothetical case study of consumer value in buying behavior. The results indicate that "Simplifying the Buying Process" is the optimal strategy across all evaluation scenarios. Sensitivity and comparative analysis also prove the stability, robustness, and high-quality of the proposed CRITIC-WASPAS model in the framework of CSFS as compared to the current fuzzy decision-making methods. The proposed work offers feasible decision support to businesses and offers novel directions to advanced MAGDM applications in the face of complex uncertainty.

Indexed as

Circular spherical fuzzy setConsumer decision analysisHybrid decision-making modelsMulti-attributes group decision-makingObjective weighting methodsPurchasing behavior strategies

Identifiers

PMID42106411
PMCPMC13346835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.