Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning and game theory for cybercrime risk assessment in online platform management systems.

Lingjia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lingjia ZhangAra Institute of Canterbury International Engineering College, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, 110168, China. zvfs4172@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A proactive framework for cybercrime risk assessment, incorporated using machine learning algorithms and game theory, analyzes platform content moderation effectiveness. With machine learning algorithms, including K-means clustering, ridge regression, interaction analysis, and optimization of Nash equilibrium in 27 quarterly platform analyses, this research proposes four categories of content risks differentiated by systematic differences in levels of threat. The strongest predictor in this sample (β = 0.63) for effectiveness is AI capabilities, accounting for 56.2% of explained variations, although effectiveness is substantially diminished by complexity in moderated content. Optimal automation rates vary from 78% for low complexity to sophisticated approaches at only 29%, offering 55% cost savings and a 54.5% decrease in breaches for low complexity, but risking higher degrees of threat for complex moderated contents. This study suggests that technological development is imperative to supplement resource development for platforms in content moderation approaches.

Indexed as

CybersecurityGame theoryInformation systemsMachine learningManagement systemsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42106396
PMCPMC13346993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.