ArticleScientific reports2026
Federated multimodal learning for privacy-preserving blood donor profiling and personalized recall strategy optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood supply shortages remain a persistent challenge for transfusion services, yet effective donor recall is hampered by fragmented data across institutions, limited profiling depth, and increasing privacy regulations. This paper proposes a federated multimodal learning framework that enables distributed blood centers to collaboratively train a shared donor profiling model without exchanging raw records. The framework integrates three modality-specific encoders - for demographic attributes, behavioral donation sequences, and textual feedback - unified through a cross-modal attention mechanism with adaptive gating. Differential privacy is embedded into the federated training pipeline via local gradient clipping and calibrated Gaussian noise injection, with cumulative privacy expenditure tracked through a moments accountant. Building on the fused donor embeddings, a multi-task recall optimization model jointly predicts optimal contact timing and communication channel, while a hierarchical clustering scheme translates predictions into tiered intervention protocols. Experiments on 127,463 donor records partitioned across six simulated blood centers demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a profiling F1 score of 83.7% and a recall conversion rate of 31.2%, approaching centralized performance within approximately 2% points. Ablation analysis confirms that the behavioral sequence modality contributes the strongest discriminative signal, while cross-modal attention yields a 4.3-point F1 improvement over naive concatenation. The privacy-utility tradeoff analysis identifies an operating range of ε ∈ [1.0, 4.0] that preserves over 93% of noise-free model utility, offering practitioners a principled basis for balancing data protection with operational effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.