Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106390›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Federated multimodal learning for privacy-preserving blood donor profiling and personalized recall strategy optimization.

Li Li, Jiaojiao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li LiHuzhou Central Blood Station, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Jiaojiao LiHuzhou Central Blood Station, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China. 18105723705@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood supply shortages remain a persistent challenge for transfusion services, yet effective donor recall is hampered by fragmented data across institutions, limited profiling depth, and increasing privacy regulations. This paper proposes a federated multimodal learning framework that enables distributed blood centers to collaboratively train a shared donor profiling model without exchanging raw records. The framework integrates three modality-specific encoders - for demographic attributes, behavioral donation sequences, and textual feedback - unified through a cross-modal attention mechanism with adaptive gating. Differential privacy is embedded into the federated training pipeline via local gradient clipping and calibrated Gaussian noise injection, with cumulative privacy expenditure tracked through a moments accountant. Building on the fused donor embeddings, a multi-task recall optimization model jointly predicts optimal contact timing and communication channel, while a hierarchical clustering scheme translates predictions into tiered intervention protocols. Experiments on 127,463 donor records partitioned across six simulated blood centers demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a profiling F1 score of 83.7% and a recall conversion rate of 31.2%, approaching centralized performance within approximately 2% points. Ablation analysis confirms that the behavioral sequence modality contributes the strongest discriminative signal, while cross-modal attention yields a 4.3-point F1 improvement over naive concatenation. The privacy-utility tradeoff analysis identifies an operating range of ε ∈ [1.0, 4.0] that preserves over 93% of noise-free model utility, offering practitioners a principled basis for balancing data protection with operational effectiveness.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsPrivacyAlgorithmsFederated LearningHumansBlood donor profilingCross-modal attentionDifferential privacyFederated learningMultimodal fusionRecall strategy optimization

Identifiers

PMID42106390
PMCPMC13346751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.