Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106363›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interpretable machine learning framework for urban flood susceptibility assessment: a multi-model comparison with spatial heterogeneity analysis in Yancheng.

Xuan Zhang, Dongdong Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xuan ZhangYancheng Kindergarten Teachers College, Yancheng, 224005, China.
Dongdong GuoYancheng Kindergarten Teachers College, Yancheng, 224005, China. unuv8243@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under the combined effects of global climate change and rapid urbanization, low-lying coastal plain cities face increasingly severe flood threats. This study developed an urban flood susceptibility assessment framework integrating multi-model comparison, SHAP interpretability analysis, and spatial heterogeneity evaluation, using Yancheng City as a case study. Based on 486 historical flood points and 10 conditioning factors, the predictive performance of Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) was compared. Results showed XGBoost performed best (AUC = 0.938, accuracy = 0.891), significantly outperforming RF (AUC = 0.912) and SVM (AUC = 0.876). SHAP analysis identified topographic wetness index (TWI), elevation, and impervious surface ratio as key driving factors, with a cumulative contribution of 47.6%. Spatial heterogeneity analysis revealed distinct flood mechanisms across geomorphic units: urban built-up areas were dominated by impervious surfaces (31.5% high-risk), Lixiahe lowland by TWI (28.6%), coastal tidal flats by elevation (23.1%), while the Yellow River paleo-channel showed the lowest risk (11.2%). Susceptibility mapping indicated 19.2% of the study area at high to very high levels, with Tinghu District reaching 37.0%. The proposed integrated framework provides scientific support for differentiated flood control strategies in coastal plain cities.

Indexed as

Flood susceptibilityMachine learningSHAP interpretabilitySpatial heterogeneityYancheng City

Identifiers

PMID42106363
PMCPMC13346997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.