ArticleScientific reports2026
Graph neural networks can predict ketosynthase substrate specificity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modular polyketide synthases are a class of biosynthetic machinery responsible for the production of a chemically diverse range of natural products, including essential medicines. The modular architecture of this system presents as inherently rearrangeable; however, manipulation of these pathways to produce novel polyketides often results in a reduced output or the pathway stalling entirely. One cause of such breakdown is the ability of ketosynthases (KS), an essential component of the biosynthetic modules, to proofread the substrate produced by preceding steps and reject unexpected chemistries. Here we explore the KS proofreading phenomenon using Graph Neural Networks (GNN) trained on KS AlphaFold structures, as a means to predict when proofreading occurs and how to mitigate it. Our GNN models can distinguish six out of ten β-carbon reduction state pairwise combinations (81-92% AUC). The α-methylation state on the polyketide substrate can also be partially predicted from the KS structure (79% AUC). To explore the utility of the GNNs as a co-pilot in mitigating proofreading, we ran a proof-of-concept experiment, where we show that the GNN models can be used to predict beneficial mutations to a KS receiving a non-native substrate. We also present a pilot study on acyltransferase domains, which identifies novel regions potentially associated with substrate specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.