Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106322›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Proactive collaboration via autonomous interaction.

Peiyan Li, Shuyuan Zhang, Wenju Yang, Yitong Hu, Yuhang Wang, Dunzheng Wang, Hang Li, Di Guo, Huaping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peiyan Li *Department of Computer Science and Technology, BNRIST, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4541-1228
Shuyuan Zhang *Department of Computer Science and Technology, BNRIST, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0897-1491
Wenju Yang *School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7378-0888
Yitong HuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1697-1465
Yuhang WangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6893-0744
Dunzheng WangDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, BNRIST, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7537-2570
Hang LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2667-8843
Di GuoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China. guodi.gd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-0103
Huaping LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, BNRIST, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. hpliu@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4042-6044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human teams excel at dynamically restructuring both task assignments and team composition in response to emerging challenges, proactively recruiting or releasing members as needed. This capacity for autonomous adaptation is a cornerstone of effective teamwork, yet remains difficult to achieve in heterogeneous multi-robot systems, which typically operate under fixed team configurations or adapt only responsively to external disruptions. In this work, we present a systematic investigation of the Proactive Collaboration paradigm for robot teams, where the working team autonomously recruits or releases members as tasks evolve. We implement this paradigm by equipping robots with the developed Autonomous Interaction framework, which utilizes need-driven multi-round communication to facilitate discussions over task progress, negotiated task allocation, and dynamic team resizing. Through real-world and simulated experiments, we demonstrate that our framework effectively realizes the Proactive Collaboration. By resolving capability gaps via anticipatory planning and minimizing action redundancy, it yields consistent and measurable gains in team efficiency and robustness. Our findings suggest that enabling individual-level initiative may offer a promising pathway toward more adaptive and cohesive collective behavior in multi-robot systems.

Identifiers

PMID42106322
PMCPMC13376541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.