ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
The role of quantitative susceptibility mapping in dementia with Lewy Bodies.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuropathological correlates of imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron overload has been implicated in the pathology of several neurodegenerative diseases, and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), an MRI-based technique, has identified abnormal iron overload in alpha-synucleinopathies. However, there is a limited understanding of the significance of changes in magnetic susceptibility, assessed by QSM, in patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). In this study, 39 DLB patients (58-88 years) and 30 cognitively unimpaired older adults (OA) (56-86 years) underwent an advanced MRI protocol that included T1w and QSM sequences, and a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. This study investigated (1) differences in whole-brain magnetic susceptibility and brain volumes between DLB patients and OA; (2) associations between regional changes in magnetic susceptibility and brain volumes, symptom duration, and cognitive functioning; (3) whether regional changes in magnetic susceptibility could differentiate DLB phenotypes based on earlier symptoms. DLB patients showed higher magnetic susceptibility values than OA in the bilateral substantia nigra, globus pallidus, thalamus, brainstem, and hippocampus, as well as in posterior cortical regions. No significant associations were observed between QSM susceptibility values and brain volumes, symptom duration, or cognitive functions. Using classificatory algorithms, different DLB phenotypes were identified based on iron accumulation values in the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and frontal cortical regions. Our findings suggest that QSM, assessing in vivo changes in brain iron accumulation, could serve as a useful noninvasive diagnostic biomarker in DLB patients. Longitudinal studies, including the prodromal phase of DLB, are needed to understand the interplay between brain volumetric loss, iron accumulation, and clinical manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.