Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42105387›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Research Note: Validation of a novel scoring system for toe pecking damage in laying hens.

Annemarie J W Mens, Malou van der Sluis

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annemarie J W MensAnimal Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: annemarie.mens@wur.nl.
Malou van der SluisAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toe pecking is an injurious behavior in commercial laying hens, that can result in pain, tissue damage, loss of toe digits, and mortality. However, little is known about the onset, risk factors and potential interventions for toe pecking behavior. To allow systematic and consistent recording of the prevalence and severity of toe pecking wounds in both research and practice, a validated and easily applicable scoring system would be helpful. Here, a scoring system for toe wounds was developed, ranging from a score of 0 (i.e., normal, greasy, no abnormal scales, no wounds, all nails) to a score of 5 (amputation or severe wound with visible bone or tendons). To validate this scoring system, its associated inter- and intra-rater reliability were determined. A total of 50 severed legs collected from carcasses were scored by five independent raters. Per leg, a score was assigned for the 1) inner toe, 2) middle toe, 3) outer toe, 4) hind toe, 5) topside of the foot, and 6) the lower part of the leg, resulting in a set of six scores per leg (300 scores per rater in total). Moreover, a subset of ten legs was scored twice (independently) to assess repeatability. After exclusion of one rater who appeared to have inadvertently mis-scored left versus right feet, a good inter-rater reliability was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.805, 95%-CI = 0.76-0.84, p < 0.001). Intra-rater reliability of the four raters was good to excellent, with ICC scores ranging from 0.78 to 0.93. Overall, the scoring system for toe wounds developed in this study can help to systematically and consistently record the prevalence and severity of toe pecking wounds in research and practice.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChickensHindlimbToesAnimalsFemaleReproducibility of ResultsAbnormal behaviorChickensDamaging behaviorWelfare

Identifiers

PMID42105387
PMCPMC13185897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.